|   | 
      | 
  
  
      | 
      | 
  
 
     | 
    | 
  
  
     | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
      | 
  
  
    | 
         
xen-devel
RE: AW: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-users] Re: Xen 4.0 - Support for	Citrix WHQ
 
I’m not going to get time to look at this in the near
future. It would be nice to get things working again though so if there are any
volunteers… 
  
  Paul 
  
From: Giovanni Bellac
[mailto:giovannib1979@xxxxxxxxx]  
Sent: 07 September 2010 15:04 
To: Paul Durrant 
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
Subject: AW: AW: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-users] Re: Xen 4.0 - Support for
Citrix WHQL-certified Windows PV drivers 
 
 
  
Hello 
 
is it in interest, to fix this issue ? 
 
Best regards 
Gio 
 
  
 
 
Von: Paul Durrant
<Paul.Durrant@xxxxxxxxxx> 
An: Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx> 
CC: Giovanni Bellac <giovannib1979@xxxxxxxxx>; Ian Campbell
<Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
<xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>;
"xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
Gesendet: Dienstag, den 7. September 2010, 16:01:14 Uhr 
Betreff: RE: AW: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-users] Re: Xen 4.0 - Support for
Citrix WHQL-certified Windows PV drivers 
 
> -----Original Message----- 
> From: Pasi Kärkkäinen [mailto:pasik@xxxxxx] 
> Sent: 07 September 2010 14:46 
> To: Paul Durrant 
> Cc: Giovanni Bellac; Ian Campbell; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; 
> xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> Subject: Re: AW: [Xen-devel] Re: [Xen-users] Re: Xen 4.0 - Support 
> for Citrix WHQL-certified Windows PV drivers 
>  
> On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 01:26:04PM +0100, Paul Durrant wrote: 
> >    Presumably the tools are creating a
/local/domain/3/console/0 
> entry if you 
> >    don't specify VNC; it's another example of the same
issue you 
> saw before. 
> > 
> >    The Citrix PV drivers are not routinely tested on
xen-unstable; 
> you need 
> >    to tweak your tools to give them the environment they
expect 
> (which is 
> >    that the only thing under /local/domain/XXX/device are
vbd and 
> vif nodes). 
> > 
>  
> I guess the behaviour of Citrix PV drivers has changed recently? 
> The drivers from XCP 0.1.x worked OK on Xen 4.0 earlier.. 
>  
 
I don't think so. I think the fe close code has been static for a while,
whereas the tools, mostly libxl, have seen massive churn of late. 
 
  Paul 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 |  
 _______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 
 |   
 
 | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
    |