This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] Remus breaks the build

On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 05:03:48PM -0700, Brendan Cully wrote:
> On Wednesday, 18 August 2010 at 16:54, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> >  On 08/18/2010 01:26 PM, Brendan Cully wrote:
> > > That's more git than I've learned. Would a patch suffice? (even
> > > producing the diff was non-obvious. It turns out that git add foo; git
> > > diff doesn't include the diff for foo!)
> > 
> > What's the origin of the code?  Do they have a git tree (I seem to
> > remember one).  I can pull from that, then apply any local patches you
> > may have.
> You're probably remembering IMQ, which was a big ugly third-party
> module but is no longer necessary, since we can now use IFB. The
> little patch I just sent (attached to the last message) was written by
> me. It's just a little queueing disciple for buffering outbound
> traffic until an rtnetlink message releases it. It's against whatever
> pvops tree xen-unstable pulls down (xen/master, I guess). Does that
> patch suffice?

Current xen-unstable uses xen/stable-2.6.32.x as a default.

-- Pasi

Xen-devel mailing list