Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] Remus breaks the build

On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 05:03:48PM -0700, Brendan Cully wrote:
> On Wednesday, 18 August 2010 at 16:54, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> >  On 08/18/2010 01:26 PM, Brendan Cully wrote:
> > > That's more git than I've learned. Would a patch suffice? (even
> > > producing the diff was non-obvious. It turns out that git add foo; git
> > > diff doesn't include the diff for foo!)
> > 
> > What's the origin of the code?  Do they have a git tree (I seem to
> > remember one).  I can pull from that, then apply any local patches you
> > may have.
> 
> You're probably remembering IMQ, which was a big ugly third-party
> module but is no longer necessary, since we can now use IFB. The
> little patch I just sent (attached to the last message) was written by
> me. It's just a little queueing disciple for buffering outbound
> traffic until an rtnetlink message releases it. It's against whatever
> pvops tree xen-unstable pulls down (xen/master, I guess). Does that
> patch suffice?
> 

Current xen-unstable uses xen/stable-2.6.32.x as a default.

-- Pasi


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread]

Current Thread

[Next in Thread>

Previous by Date:

[Xen-devel] xl fails to work with some command, Zhang, Yang Z

Next by Date:

Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-4.0-testing test] 2032: regressions - FAIL, Keir Fraser

Previous by Thread:

Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] Remus breaks the build, Brendan Cully

Next by Thread:

[Xen-devel] MAINTAINERS file for Xen, Keir Fraser

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]