Re: [Xen-devel] [GIT PULL] devel/pat + devel/kms.fixes-0.5 on RV

To:	Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [Xen-devel] [GIT PULL] devel/pat + devel/kms.fixes-0.5 on RV730 PRO [Radeon HD 4650] Stack trace
From:	Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 18 Aug 2010 12:30:07 -0700 (PDT)
Cc:	xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date:	Wed, 18 Aug 2010 12:30:52 -0700
Dkim-signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1282159807; bh=/CDPYK6f8GyuXVFdnb9me6Othjn3wvcg4osKYD5DExU=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=oSAueP2l1kqGq/H5pOanROeE8/L/kAmMvZTA+wYC66BGLOxnLigpQu4A778kVowr5GJHmF8o5BjcnY9kzNSgYzmLj6/cGzuo+8VZZxoGGF6g0yYkONhf6ondMSQBCfmiyBxrndcKwxGhxzNF3xhVMJfPM18ZxhfXVYHrtps78iI=
Domainkey-signature:	a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=xcIlp/vGX476zpvQeVV47hsG7e6fW0SSfuXH5YBp25yffwj7DRMjdxW3MAFoC9bEFIkq2vl55Vyxb3s8kl90R3UcAZYGENeL7KlEtiApwk8ftXhWONqmqNkYGsLMRYQUMFIugrm6P4eoJ7NeGq0q+PareFrPFIK1byz5r9y0Mkg=;
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<20100818185722.GA18021@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

> Or wait a couple of days and wait for me to rebase my devel/next.drm, which has DRM from 2.6.34.

This is the best option.

Thank you.
Boris

--- On Wed, 8/18/10, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [GIT PULL] devel/pat + devel/kms.fixes-0.5 on RV730 PRO [Radeon HD 4650] Stack trace
To: "Boris Derzhavets" <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Wednesday, August 18, 2010, 2:57 PM

On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 05:48:47AM -0700, Boris Derzhavets wrote:
> Just surfing Net for 2-3 hr concerning "dracut" on Fedora 13.
> Several "warnings" at the end of dmesg log. Seems like reaction
> on some system events scheduled to run on regular basis, but not
> user's activity.

I am pretty sure you are hitting this bug:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=558190
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=537981
that got fixed in v2.6.33 with this patch:

commit 4c7886791264f03428d5424befb1b96f08fc90f4
Author: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri Nov 20 14:29:23 2009 +0100

drm/radeon/kms: Rework radeon object handling

The locking & protection of radeon object was somewhat messy.
This patch completely rework it to now use ttm reserve as a
protection for the radeon object structure member. It also
shrink down the various radeon object structure by removing
field which were redondant with the ttm information. Last it
converts few simple functions to inline which should with
performances.

airlied: rebase on top of r600 and other changes.

and backporting this back to xen/stable-2.32.x.. is not something
I am going to do.

Looking in in kernel-2.6.32.8-58.fc12.x86_64 the patch that fixed this was
drm-upgrayedd.patch which is a mega-update of DRM to 2.6.33.

It even has nouveau bits in it.

So, you will have to wait till 2.6.36 rebase is complete. Or
you can try back-porting those patches. Or wait a couple of days
and wait for me to rebase my devel/next.drm, which has DRM from
2.6.34.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [GIT PULL] devel/pat + devel/kms.fixes-0.5 on RV730 PRO