| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 01/15] xen: Update libxc calls
|
To: |
Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Subject: |
[Xen-devel] Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 01/15] xen: Update libxc calls |
|
From: |
Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Date: |
Wed, 18 Aug 2010 12:47:36 +0100 |
|
Cc: |
Paolo, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "qemu-devel@xxxxxxxxxx" <qemu-devel@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Anthony@xxxxxxxxxx" <Anthony@xxxxxxxxxx>, Anthony Perard <anthony.perard@xxxxxxxxxx>, Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Delivery-date: |
Wed, 18 Aug 2010 04:47:56 -0700 |
|
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
In-reply-to: |
<4C6BACDC.2060401@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
|
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
|
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
|
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
|
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
|
References: |
<alpine.DEB.2.00.1008121244200.2545@kaball-desktop> <1281622202-3453-1-git-send-email-stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4C6402E2.5090408@xxxxxxxxxx> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1008121524170.2545@kaball-desktop> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1008121528380.2545@kaball-desktop> <4C6BACDC.2060401@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
User-agent: |
Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) |
On Wed, 18 Aug 2010, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > I mean we can add them to libxc so that there is no need for this patch
> > anymore.
>
> That would be great. When adding the xen bits initially I've tried to
> avoid hard dependencies on specific xen versions. There are some ifdefs
> in the qemu code to support compiling with various xen versions (IIRC
> 3.1 -> 3.4 worked last time I've tried). I think the minimum supported
> range of xen versions should be the ones still actively maintained by
> xensource (I think this is 3.4, 4.0 and unstable right now). Supporting
> even older versions would be nice to have.
>
I agree on the range of xen versions, but supporting even a wider range
shouldn't be too hard, it just requires few more ifdef's.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home