|  |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
 
  |   |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
  
    |   xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] BLKTAPCTRL[2375]: blktapctrl_linux.c:86: blktap0	open fa 
| To: | Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |  
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-devel] BLKTAPCTRL[2375]: blktapctrl_linux.c:86: blktap0	open failed, tap: vs. tap2: |  
| From: | Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx> |  
| Date: | Mon, 2 Aug 2010 15:11:52 +0300 |  
| Cc: | Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>,	Xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jim Fehlig <jfehlig@xxxxxxxxxx>,	Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>,	Daniel Stodden <Daniel.Stodden@xxxxxxxxxx>,	Dante Cinco <dantecinco@xxxxxxxxx> |  
| Delivery-date: | Mon, 02 Aug 2010 05:12:30 -0700 |  
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |  
| In-reply-to: | <C8743FD7.1BABA%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |  
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |  
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |  
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |  
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |  
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |  
| References: | <20100727062101.GL17817@xxxxxxxxxxx>	<C8743FD7.1BABA%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |  
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |  
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |  
| On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 07:48:39AM +0100, Keir Fraser wrote:
> On 27/07/2010 07:21, "Pasi Kärkkäinen" <pasik@xxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> >>> That sounds like a lot of fallout on xen-users.
> >>> Especially for people who just want their guests to boot.
> >>> 
> >>> Maybe the whole notation should have rather been some _optional_ blktap
> >>> = {1|2} cfg key, only for those who actually care?
> >> 
> >> FWIW, I completely agree with this.
> >> 
> > 
> > Yeah, especially when blktap2 is the only available on in pvops dom0 
> > kernels..
> > All the users have tap:something in their cfgfiles currently..
> 
> Well the patch to make the distinction is currently in xen-unstable and
> xen-4.0. Should it be reverted from one or both? Actually it is up to IanJ
> or Stefano to decide on that now.
> 
Now when Xen 4.0.1-rc5 is out I guess this should be decided shortly..
-- Pasi
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 | 
 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |  | 
Re: [Xen-devel] BLKTAPCTRL[2375]: blktapctrl_linux.c:86: blktap0	open failed, tap: vs. tap2:,
Pasi Kärkkäinen <=
 |  |  | 
  
    |  |  |