Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Virtual disk configuration, PV vs. emulated, backward compatibility etc

[Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Ian Campbell writes ("[Xen-devel] [RFC] Virtual disk configuration, PV vs. 
emulated, backward compatibility etc"):
> In an attempt to clean this up, or at least make the strange behaviour
> more explicit, I'd like to propose some extensions to the dXpY syntax
> supported by libxl such that the other existing ways of specifying
> devices become syntactic sugar for specific well defined configurations
> in the new syntax, whilst preserving backwards compatibility.

Urgh.  I don't like this at all.  I have a completely different
conceptual model.  I guess I'll have to write it up.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel