 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] remove Default-Enabled from LSB header
| To: | Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] remove Default-Enabled from LSB header |
| From: | Olaf Hering <olaf@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 23 Jul 2010 20:39:25 +0200 |
| Cc: | xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivery-date: | Fri, 23 Jul 2010 11:40:34 -0700 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1279910369; l=898; s=domk; d=aepfle.de; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Subject:Cc:To:From: Date:X-RZG-CLASS-ID:X-RZG-AUTH; bh=2GjhhnKiwc4Bd9GUGqcfCgmqpfw=; b=vPXTZgAd+DIN1JT+H4/DlwfmF4gyc/Z8ftQoGHT0ZWsLBKom3wVGL+OYJzWUy6XSgXI 2yrqnGlValPgdM70H99e5bHlLGpLN0VnTiKb4yzkDvr1KMrOIVMLmZlHagu9RWNPeBvdA u6mtYjI3PRLCoj2ZedBKmMe7UZYTFDJFxzE= |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <19529.51415.973935.754110@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| References: | <20100723121917.GE3540@xxxxxxxxx> <19529.51415.973935.754110@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Fri, Jul 23, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Olaf Hering writes ("[Xen-devel] [PATCH] remove Default-Enabled from LSB
> header"):
> > Default-Enabled: is not a LSB keyword.
> > Move it out of the LSB section to avoid an openSuSE buildcheck warning.
>
> I'm pretty sure it was put there for a reason by the people who added
> these files. If we move it out of the INIT INFO section it's probably
> going to stop working.
Its not clear what the intention was, LSB does not mention this keyword.
Google has some hits about X-UnitedLinux-Default-Enabled: which implies
what someone tried to get rid of the vendor part from this old string
from end of 2002.
I'm sure nothing will break if the lines disappear.
> Is it actually a breach of the LSB spec to include nonstandard
> keywords ?
I havent checked if LSB forbids it. Most likely the tools should
tolerate unknown keywords.
Olaf
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] install udev rules into rules.d, Olaf Hering |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] add LSB header to xen-watchdog runlevel script, Olaf Hering |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] remove Default-Enabled from LSB header, Ian Jackson |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] remove Default-Enabled from LSB header, Ian Jackson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
