WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.0.1-rc4 and stable 2.6.32.x pvops won't start xend

On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 09:10:23AM -0700, Rose, Gregory V wrote:
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:xen-devel-
> >bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Rose, Gregory V
> >Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2010 8:53 AM
> >Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.0.1-rc4 and stable 2.6.32.x pvops won't
> >start xend
> >
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: Pasi Kärkkäinen [mailto:pasik@xxxxxx]
> >>Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2010 2:05 AM
> >>To: Rose, Gregory V
> >>Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.0.1-rc4 and stable 2.6.32.x pvops won't
> >>start xend
> >>
> >>>
> >>
> >>Does that help?
> >
> >Well, it tells me what is wrong but not how to fix it...
> >
> >;-)
> >
> >For some reason the stable-2.6.32x branch doesn't have the
> >drivers/xen/gntdev driver source in it while the 2.6.31 kernel does.
> >Beats me why...
> >
> >When I run menuconfig in the 2.6.31 kernel I see the option for
> >XEN_GNTDEV but not in the 2.6.32 kernel.  Copying the config from 2.6.31
> >to 2.6.32 doesn't help because the driver module is missing from the
> >tree and just won't show up.
> >
> >I'll go search the archives some more and see if I can find any answers.
> 
> OK, I was working off of a special branch created by Jeremy to test the 
> SR-IOV patches that allow for setting the VF MAC and VLAN from the host VMM 
> using RTNETLINK messages and netdev ops.  That branch doesn't include the 
> gntdev.c device.  When I switched back to the xen/stable-2.6.32.x branch it 
> was back again.  My confusion I guess, I was under the impression Jeremy's 
> sr-iov branch was based on the stable-2.6.32.x branch that I had originally 
> posted my patches against.  Evidently they're not.
> 
> I'm going to chalk it up to code management and branching confusion...
> 

:)

Good that it works now.

-- Pasi


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel