WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] 2.6.32.16: hvm domU boot - oops at add_pin_to_irq_node_

On Fri, 9 Jul 2010, Bruce Edge wrote:
> 2010/7/9 Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> On Fri, 9 Jul 2010, Łukasz Oleś wrote:
> > W dniu 9 lipca 2010 11:42 użytkownik Łukasz Oleś <lukaszoles@xxxxxxxxx> 
> > napisał:
> > > 2010/7/8 Łukasz Oleś <lukaszoles@xxxxxxxxx>:
> > >> On Thursday 08 July 2010 17:39:49 Bruce Edge wrote:
> > >>> This is the same problem as this post:
> > >>> http://lists.xensource.com/archives/html/xen-devel/2010-06/msg01114.html
> > >>>
> > >>> Stefano suggested I retry after Jeremy's pull.
> > >>>
> > >>> Sync'd with 2.6.32.16 last night and it looks like the identical 
> > >>> problem.
> > >>>
> > >>> I can boot Ubuntu 10.04 with it's own native kernel, but not with a 
> > >>> pv-ops
> > >>> kernel.
> > >>
> > >> I have identical problem and tried with and without 
> > >> CONFIG_XEN_PLATFORM_PCI
> > >> option.
> > >>
> > >> I'll test xen/next-2.6.32 and see if it helps.
> > >>
> > >
> > > I tried xen/next-2.6.32 and there is no call trace but now it just hangs.
> > > I'm running this kernel as HVM domU, but it has enabled options for
> > > dom0. Should this work?
> > >
> > > Attached kernel config file and logs from xen/stable-2.6.32 
> > > xen/next-2.6.32
> > >
> >
> > Sending also output from xm log
> >
> > This line: "(XEN) hvm.c:3115:d15 Bad HVM op 9."  appears when starting
> > domU with kernel from  xen/next-2.6.32
> 
> That line means that you are running on a Xen version that doesn't have
> HVMOP_pagetable_dying, like xen 4.0 testing for example. It shouldn't
> caouse any trouble per se.
> If you are running on xen 4.0, could you please apply to the hypervisor
> the patch I attached to this email and try one more time?
> 
> Is this patch required for xen-testing 4.0.1rc3 ?
> 
 
no it is not required, but it is going to improve PV on HVM performances
and it is known to solve some locking issues.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>