Re: [Xen-devel] State of gdbsx in xen-4.0-testing.hg and debugge

To:	Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [Xen-devel] State of gdbsx in xen-4.0-testing.hg and debugger documentation.
From:	Bruce Edge <bruce.edge@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Tue, 6 Jul 2010 06:37:28 -0700
Cc:	"xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date:	Tue, 06 Jul 2010 06:38:22 -0700
Dkim-signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=6sH250FG+BBUGG4XiJPylSa3IuA7sFign3QBnSQ9UzE=; b=QIyIY9MJzckKGIExHXh7TdiO+kL5w9tlJZI9UqeZ3m70Oq1OhQ2b16MX8XFu75th9N GZOxTR0vflqoXwTv/LAfY7imp6iP4u56V+guHmeVgHNUDCm2cnE/cTeifJ3HhSsmM30e Oq8+FoZlUZY44NDa0eLMeU7iPEecn07DHD/XI=
Domainkey-signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=EsNket1AccCbPjNyf0Yjqwx5tnaynktc66rJqHaLHj0OnfKmHLcJ01wz3SYParWW3H 4+nx0AL4fCeRpse/8J4f+NeCV2P9NB3yYj/UwqYXb20isiKdo7BBUzWy5noUgitj+DDR IeHgQpfCHohe0LB1838WWQZlRJ/8MgvwINX/Q=
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<19507.6707.47260.44850@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References:	<AANLkTilqNc_oQ0JmUYUBHLBmNOZ-K8VklsEOEDAHvGlt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <C8534197.19427%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTimwMvuetvx6LyBvqqWkF-omqjwEvGqmvkKF6OGF@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <19502.6544.743563.733900@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <AANLkTilwUZcleliBYV75HLpUth_eHfbYIoLbFFKneLOI@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <19507.6707.47260.44850@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 4:57 AM, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Bruce Edge writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] State of gdbsx in xen-4.0-testing.hg and debugger documentation."):

> Here is a patch to enable gdbsx by default.

Thanks. Is it against 4.0-testing as it seems to be ?

Yes, it is.

I think we
probably want this against xen-unstable, against which your patch
doesn't apply.

OK, I'll pull down an unstable tree and resubmit.

Thanks for the help.

-Bruce

> I suppose it would be cleaner to eliminate the debugger dir as gdbsx is the
> only one under there that's used and that would enable the tools/Rules.mk
> templates to cover the
> subdir-clean-gdbsx:
> subdir-install-gdbsx
> targets and not require them to be explicit in tools/Makefile

Well, yes, until we got another debugger again.

> Also, I don't know if
> SUBDIRS-y += debugger/gdbsx
> should be conditional on any type of target, CONFIG_X86 or?

I'm happy to enable it and get the people who find it breaks to
tell us what conditions mean it needs to be disabled :-).

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] State of gdbsx in xen-4.0-testing.hg and debugger docum