WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Question about backporting pci passthrough fix to 2.6.18

To: Paraic Gallagher <paraic.gallagher@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Question about backporting pci passthrough fix to 2.6.18
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2010 11:40:14 -0400
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Thu, 01 Jul 2010 08:41:53 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <AANLkTilnZEgcdoM3BXhAfDiWxZGRLKgJ1GAmWnaEnNt8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <AANLkTilnZEgcdoM3BXhAfDiWxZGRLKgJ1GAmWnaEnNt8@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-12-10)
On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 10:04:01AM +0100, Paraic Gallagher wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I have a question about the bug:
> http://bugzilla.xensource.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1632
> 
> This is marked as fixed in the pv-ops kernel.
> 
> I am working for a company developing a xen based virtualisation solution.
> Unfortunately the design is tied to CentOS and there is resistance to
> upgrade to > 2.6.31 kernel.
> 
> My question is whether it is possible for me to try to backport the fixes
> for this pci passthrough issue to a 2.6.18 kernel, or are there too many
> differences between the kernel versions to make this feasible/possible.

You should be able to do it. The SysFS parts might need some tweaking.
> 
> 
> ------- Comment #1 from konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx  2010-06-30 07:54 -------
> There is a fix for this in the pv-ops kernel.
> 
> Specifically:
>  xen-pciback: Allocate IRQ handler for device that is shared with guest.
>      xen-pciback: Add SysFS instrumentation for the fake IRQ handler.
>      xen-pciback: When device transitions to MSI/MSI-X stop ACK-ing on the
> legacy interrupt.
>      xen-pciback: Enable interrupt handler when device is enabled.
>      xen-pciback: Probe the IRQ line to check if it is not shared
> 
> Here is a howto on PV-OPS:http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenParavirtOps
> and how to migrate from RHEL5 to it
> http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/2.6.18-to-2.6.31-and-higher
> 
> Closing bug as FIXED in upstream.

> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>