Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] blktap2 control function (version 2)

To:	Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] blktap2 control function (version 2)
From:	eXeC001er <execooler@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Wed, 30 Jun 2010 17:47:11 +0400
Cc:	Xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date:	Wed, 30 Jun 2010 06:48:29 -0700
Dkim-signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=VF+sOlmmOEdJNVu6+zKW2zGIXCCQQwJXtuSLcLgE47g=; b=dfHEu3iuK8WlXU8Ean0NN3tcf4SRN5tGamgGJM/VrmTguv9DOQVZycko5t6D0U0JGX INH7Scd6gUVZ1M30NT4G+36Mc5/9OF90pTiRUq4BWB/Ref/DVn8Zw3Sf0/dMQezrRcHc 3736uVoCQMB0RAmX1BMUM0+6H81RhNgUyhaBM=
Domainkey-signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=F4HWPBjNVUvVyQIDHEsQMwsesBLaFQcILxNC1MpFB+Oelg805cU0MxX39zAo3d5Wq3 ORw7b9Q32lhmccU+x6+gDRUYa3scIzFgB16MlfXZcvOPkHtNjSvTxz/wmE+Qcv3KPyJQ BzK2HCeR/nbkMh7s1pXpgqSkZTZ1zuXsYBVDQ=
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<C84FC222.18FAD%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References:	<19497.64569.352352.782736@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <C84FC222.18FAD%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

When it rolled back the changes?

2010/6/29 Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On 29/06/2010 14:59, "Ian Jackson" <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> Does that mean that xen-unstable needs fixing too ? I'd rather apply
>> a change to xen-unstable first and test it there.
>>
>> xen-unstable have my previous patch, but it can lead to regression (if use
>> 'tap:xxx' instead 'tap:tapdisk:xxx')
>
> Should we revert your previous patch while we discuss it ?

I reverted it from xen-4.0-testing already for obvious reasons. I think it
makes sense to do so in xen-unstable too (via your tree) and then re-start
from a clean slate in all trees.

-- Keir

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] blktap2 control function (version 2)