[Xen-devel] Re: APIC errors resulting from too early set_timer()

To:	Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	[Xen-devel] Re: APIC errors resulting from too early set_timer()
From:	Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Tue, 29 Jun 2010 13:17:04 +0100
Cc:	"xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date:	Tue, 29 Jun 2010 05:21:00 -0700
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<4C29FAA9020000780000890E@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index:	AcsXgZSdk6cf+Mp4RCuu/9xdYYOBIAAA2dRZ
Thread-topic:	APIC errors resulting from too early set_timer()
User-agent:	Microsoft-Entourage/12.24.0.100205

On 29/06/2010 12:52, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>>>> On 29.06.10 at 12:32, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I suggest that we mask the given cpumap against cpu_online_map, and
>> smp_processor_id() while we're at it, in
>> arch/x86/smp.c:smp_send_event_check_mask(). If you agree that this makes
>> sense I will make the patch myself.
> 
> Yes, this sounds appropriate to me.

xen-unstable:21690, although I ended up pushing the logic into the
send_IPI_mask variants.

 -- Keir

> Thanks, Jan
> 



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] Re: APIC errors resulting from too early set_timer()