[Xen-devel] One question to p2m type

To:	Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	[Xen-devel] One question to p2m type
From:	"Jiang, Yunhong" <yunhong.jiang@xxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Mon, 28 Jun 2010 17:57:46 +0800
Accept-language:	en-US
Acceptlanguage:	en-US
Cc:	xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date:	Mon, 28 Jun 2010 03:01:39 -0700
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index:	AcsWqFwVHsEVfcLxRyyodNoUUhIZng==
Thread-topic:	One question to p2m type

Tim, one question to the p2m type.
As you reminded before, in PAE environment, p2m type can only hold 8 types in 
total, that means we should not have > p2m_grant_map_ro in p2m table. 

However, I didn't find any code to make sure this. For example, I didn't find 
any code to make sure mem_paging_domctl can't execut in PAE environment. Is it 
because p2m_change_type to >8 type will only impact guet itself, and we don't 
need to care for it?

Thanks
--jyh

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] One question to p2m type