WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] don't save Xen heap pages during domain save

To: "Keir Fraser" <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] don't save Xen heap pages during domain save
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 13:39:51 +0100
Cc:
Delivery-date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 05:40:53 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <C83D2F33.17896%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <4C1783FB0200007800006777@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <C83D2F33.17896%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> On 15.06.10 at 14:22, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I've applied all your patches as of xen-unstable:21621. Are they all
> suitable for Xen 4.0.x do you think? What about 3.4.x?

No, perhaps not all of them. Some of them fixes issues that must
have been introduced recently, so they would qualify for older trees
only if the respective base patches also went there.

That is,
- the domain save one likely is a candidate, but it should see some
  broader testing first
- the pv cpuid masking one likely is a candidate, together with Intel's
  original one (whether just for 4.0 or also for 3.4 is more difficult to
  judge)
- the IRQ signed-ness one should be applicable to 4.0 only
- the MCE, superpage, wrmsr warning, and pyxc ones fall into the
  above category
- the LZO patches, while supposedly safe, don't look like backporting
  candidates to me

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>