|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] don't save Xen heap pages during domain save
>>> On 15.06.10 at 14:22, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I've applied all your patches as of xen-unstable:21621. Are they all
> suitable for Xen 4.0.x do you think? What about 3.4.x?
No, perhaps not all of them. Some of them fixes issues that must
have been introduced recently, so they would qualify for older trees
only if the respective base patches also went there.
That is,
- the domain save one likely is a candidate, but it should see some
broader testing first
- the pv cpuid masking one likely is a candidate, together with Intel's
original one (whether just for 4.0 or also for 3.4 is more difficult to
judge)
- the IRQ signed-ness one should be applicable to 4.0 only
- the MCE, superpage, wrmsr warning, and pyxc ones fall into the
above category
- the LZO patches, while supposedly safe, don't look like backporting
candidates to me
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
|
|