WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Re: PoD issue

>>> Pasi Kärkkäinen 06/04/10 5:03 PM >>>
>On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 08:19:15AM +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> Keith Coleman  19.02.10 01:03 >>>
>> >On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 2:12 PM, George Dunlap
>> > wrote:
>> >> Yeah, the OSS tree doesn't get the kind of regression testing it
>> >> really needs at the moment.  I was using the OSS balloon drivers when
>> >> I implemented and submitted the PoD code last year.  I didn't have any
>> >> trouble then, and I was definitely using up all of the memory.  But I
>> >> haven't done any testing on OSS since then, basically.
>> >>
>> >
>> >Is it expected that booting HVM guests with maxmem > memory is
>> >unstable? In testing 3.4.3-rc2 (kernel 2.6.18 c/s 993) I can easily
>> >crash the guest and occasionally the entire server.
>> 
>> Crashing the guest is expected if the guest doesn't have a fixed
>> balloon driver (i.e. the mentioned c/s would need to be in the
>> sources the pv drivers for the guest were built from).
>> 
>> Crashing the host is certainly unacceptable - please provide logs
>> thereof.
>> 
>
>Was this resolved? Someone was complaining recently that maxmem != memory
>crashes his Xen host..

I don 't recall ever having seen logs of a host crash of this sort,
so if this ever was the case and no-one else fixed it, I would
believe it still to be an issue.

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>