|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Biweekly VMX status report. Xen: #21438 & Xen0: #a3e7c7.
On 02/06/2010 10:24, "Jiang, Yunhong" <yunhong.jiang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> (XEN) Pagetable walk from ffff83022fe1d000:
> (XEN) L4[0x106] = 00000000cfc8d027 5555555555555555
> (XEN) L3[0x008] = 00000000cfef9063 5555555555555555
> (XEN) L2[0x17f] = 000000022ff2a063 5555555555555555
> (XEN) L1[0x01d] = 000000022fe1d262 5555555555555555
>
> I really can't imagine how this can happen considering the vmx_alloc_vmcs() is
> so straight-forward. My test machine is really magic.
Not at all. The free-memory pool was getting spiked with guarded (mapped
not-present) pages. The later unlucky allocator is the one that then
crashes.
I've just fixed this as xen-unstable:21504. The bug was a silly typo.
Thanks,
Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- RE: [Xen-devel] Biweekly VMX status report. Xen: #21438 & Xen0: #a3e7c7..., Jiang, Yunhong
- Re: [Xen-devel] Biweekly VMX status report. Xen: #21438 & Xen0: #a3e7c7..., Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] Biweekly VMX status report. Xen: #21438 & Xen0: #a3e7c7..., Jiang, Yunhong
- Re: [Xen-devel] Biweekly VMX status report. Xen: #21438 & Xen0: #a3e7c7..., Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] Biweekly VMX status report. Xen: #21438 & Xen0: #a3e7c7..., Jiang, Yunhong
- RE: [Xen-devel] Biweekly VMX status report. Xen: #21438 & Xen0: #a3e7c7..., Jiang, Yunhong
- Re: [Xen-devel] Biweekly VMX status report. Xen: #21438 & Xen0: #a3e7c7...,
Keir Fraser <=
- RE: [Xen-devel] Biweekly VMX status report. Xen: #21438 & Xen0: #a3e7c7..., Jiang, Yunhong
- Re: [Xen-devel] Biweekly VMX status report. Xen: #21438 & Xen0: #a3e7c7..., Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] Biweekly VMX status report. Xen: #21438 & Xen0: #a3e7c7..., Jiang, Yunhong
- Re: [Xen-devel] Biweekly VMX status report. Xen: #21438 & Xen0: #a3e7c7..., Keir Fraser
|
|
|
|
|