This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


Re: [Xen-devel] Name of event-channel and other devices vs. udev

To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Name of event-channel and other devices vs. udev
From: Bastian Blank <waldi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 00:58:27 +0200
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Thu, 27 May 2010 16:00:26 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4BFEF43D.90101@xxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Mail-followup-to: Bastian Blank <waldi@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20100526105144.GA28280@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100527073512.GA17135@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100527143104.GB6040@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4BFEEC96.3010207@xxxxxxxx> <20100527222641.GA25018@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4BFEF43D.90101@xxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 03:37:49PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> On 05/27/2010 03:26 PM, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > To possibilities:
> > - Fix the error detection in this crude device creation code.
> > - Rip it out and always rely on the system to provide the devices.
> > For Debian I already decided to use the later one.
> Yes, that seems like the cleanest approach.  Does it need any udev
> config to get that right?  In particular, is there a mechanism to
> autoload misc device modules?

No, there is no autoloading possible; neither now nor with the patch.
The default udev config is correct in this case.


Warp 7 -- It's a law we can live with.

Xen-devel mailing list