This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Physical hot-add cpus and TSC

To: "Jiang, Yunhong" <yunhong.jiang@xxxxxxxxx>, Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Xen-Devel (xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ian Pratt <Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Physical hot-add cpus and TSC
From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 09:44:04 +0100
Delivery-date: Thu, 27 May 2010 01:45:19 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <789F9655DD1B8F43B48D77C5D30659731E78D370@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: Acr9DCRUdsbAwjwNShi1j/opExZiCAADerkzABJtHKAABT/KEQ==
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] [RFC] Physical hot-add cpus and TSC
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/
On 27/05/2010 07:15, "Jiang, Yunhong" <yunhong.jiang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>>>> get synced up before host software gets a look in. I don't think we can
>>>> comment on whether or not there is an issue here without more
>>>> information.
> Yes, this is a issue. The TSC will not be synched by firmware when hot-added,
> at least I didn't find any spec on this, and my experiment shows the TSC value
> is very small when new CPU is brought up. We need sync it in Xen side,
> Is it possible to sync the new-added CPU with the BSP when the CPU is added
> (changed from non-present to present), as Keir suggested in previous mail? I
> will have a look on the related code.

I implemented this as xen-unstable:21468. This represents a strict
improvement on what was in xen-unstable before that (no tsc sync at all,
ever, because I deleted it about a week ago). Open to further improvements,
if we can get consensus.

 -- Keir

Xen-devel mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>