This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


Re: [Xen-devel] regression with c/s 21223

To: Jim Fehlig <jfehlig@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] regression with c/s 21223
From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 19:12:10 +0100
Cc: Xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ryan O'Connor <rjo@xxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Fri, 07 May 2010 11:12:45 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4BE4178E.2030406@xxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: Acrt6nFeCHJPg73+Q0WgQIjjI3YFmQAJl4Ie
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] regression with c/s 21223
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/
On 07/05/2010 14:37, "Jim Fehlig" <jfehlig@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> Way outside my comfort zone with xend I'm afraid. Do you think we need
>> explicit differentiation between tap and tap2?
> That is certainly an approach we are considering for our Xen 4.0-based
> packages - see attached patch.  As mentioned previously, we are not yet
> supporting blktap2 so such a change seems appropriate in our case.

Does that simple patch really "just work"? I suppose it really just punts
the tap2 issues, unless we also get rid of the tap2-falls-back-to-tap1

 -- Keir

> I'm hoping some of the folks that integrated blktap2 in xend can provide
> suggestions.

Xen-devel mailing list