| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
RE: [Xen-devel] [Question] vcpu-set before or after xen_pause_requested
|
To: |
"Jiang, Yunhong" <yunhong.jiang@xxxxxxxxx> |
|
Subject: |
RE: [Xen-devel] [Question] vcpu-set before or after xen_pause_requested |
|
From: |
Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Date: |
Wed, 28 Apr 2010 11:30:51 +0100 |
|
Cc: |
"Liu, Jinsong" <jinsong.liu@xxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Zhai, Edwin" <edwin.zhai@xxxxxxxxx> |
|
Delivery-date: |
Wed, 28 Apr 2010 03:32:03 -0700 |
|
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|
In-reply-to: |
<789F9655DD1B8F43B48D77C5D30659731D851D23@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
|
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
|
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
|
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
|
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
|
References: |
<EB8593BCECAB3D40A8248BE0B6400A38469C6F70@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <19399.7706.36343.487108@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <BC00F5384FCFC9499AF06F92E8B78A9E026FAC6041@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <19404.31543.186398.77423@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <789F9655DD1B8F43B48D77C5D30659731D851D23@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Jiang, Yunhong writes ("RE: [Xen-devel] [Question] vcpu-set before or after
xen_pause_requested"):
> For example, considering user do vcpu-set 2 (i.e set vcpu number to
> 2), vcpu-set 4, and vcpu-set 2, and guest didn't take any action at
> all, would it be really so important? Or, if it is 2->4->3, should
> the xm vcpu-set itself really need care 4 vcpu is bringup in some
> time?
This is a good point. If you are sure that intermediate values are
not important, and that changes are idempotent, then the open loop
approach is quite fine.
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
| <Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- RE: [Xen-devel] [Question] vcpu-set before or after xen_pause_requested, (continued)
- RE: [Xen-devel] [Question] vcpu-set before or after xen_pause_requested, Liu, Jinsong
- RE: [Xen-devel] [Question] vcpu-set before or after xen_pause_requested, Ian Jackson
- RE: [Xen-devel] [Question] vcpu-set before or after xen_pause_requested, Liu, Jinsong
- RE: [Xen-devel] [Question] vcpu-set before or after xen_pause_requested, Ian Jackson
- RE: [Xen-devel] [Question] vcpu-set before or after xen_pause_requested, Liu, Jinsong
- RE: [Xen-devel] [Question] vcpu-set before or after xen_pause_requested, Ian Jackson
- RE: [Xen-devel] [Question] vcpu-set before or after xen_pause_requested, Liu, Jinsong
- RE: [Xen-devel] [Question] vcpu-set before or after xen_pause_requested, Ian Jackson
- RE: [Xen-devel] [Question] vcpu-set before or after xen_pause_requested, Liu, Jinsong
- RE: [Xen-devel] [Question] vcpu-set before or after xen_pause_requested, Jiang, Yunhong
- RE: [Xen-devel] [Question] vcpu-set before or after xen_pause_requested,
Ian Jackson <=
- RE: [Xen-devel] [Question] vcpu-set before or after xen_pause_requested, Jiang, Yunhong
|
|
|
| |
|
Home