Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 2] Remus: support for pvops dom0

[Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

áukasz Oleû writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 2] Remus: support for pvops 
dom0"):
> On Thursday 15 April 2010 15:58:27 Ian Jackson wrote:
> > I haven't looked at the code for the "remus" utility, but: How hard is
> > it going to be to port it to libxl ?  I think remus is too exciting a
> > feature to be left to rot with xend.
> 
> What is wrong with xend? I'm new here, and I just started to learn this 
> stuff... :)

xend has a huge amount of unfortunately rather unreliable code to do
what is essentially a very simple set of tasks.  IMO it needs to be
thrown away.  Part of the benefit of libxl is that it provides a basis
for providing a utility like xl which does the same things as xm but
with much less code - specifically without xend.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel