| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] future plans for libxl?
Vincent Hanquez writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] future plans for libxl?"):
> On 15/04/10 14:53, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Perhaps rather than expecting the libxl caller to include
> > xen/include/public/version.h, it would be better to have a single
> > libxc call that fills in a single structure by making all the relevant
> > calls and copying the data out.
...
> That's fine if it happens, but it's not like it's performance
> critical or will ever be. not adding a new version hypercall and
> doing it in a series of hypercalls, means that the code stays
> compatible with old hypervisor.
Yes, that's what I was suggesting. I don't think we need a new
hypercall.
Ian.
(resent with correct recipient list)
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home