Re: [Xen-devel] Scheduling anomaly with 4.0.0 (rc6)

To:	Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	Re: [Xen-devel] Scheduling anomaly with 4.0.0 (rc6)
From:	George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Tue, 6 Apr 2010 18:17:27 +0100
Cc:	"Xen-Devel \(xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx\)" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date:	Tue, 06 Apr 2010 10:18:08 -0700
Dkim-signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:received:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=6Y+sdNk+NM9NmrYvJP5gibE8NPxIwq9GxQ1h0zo/Haw=; b=kMAFa2vIUlkyEJeTZV5OIEWoNyXrzoezZ0j9gMbjwF1nh8tXfolS7Q15uF3+RY0Xsg D3IUGPFUjU1toxxXLXKV0bkfj3Hgw/3Bt0RVOVuO47AcinMLTXHsAfVgbYE38Ict7sY5 rO4GqjyHUM460gphB2YNLKKPv5fU2FSYNDqiE=
Domainkey-signature:	a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=AF6ENQkrsjvYeg1oISmk5PjrYL8HD+vxSGTjab65Z7/WTwN60e0aVB94Cy9QW1T2Cy 3qbpjFEAwUgAE4KQImGwHxZWRr6I86+lFPb8kv3P4zJD9LW2R2L0M9/goOTCxlFo9J1f GuuqZxsMov090+XesJOVSz0IaF43p1l7lQnY0=
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<0a8805a2-ee8b-456d-a4ed-b75c34f73661@default>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References:	<c30b927d-2424-4135-a1b5-c7e2cc9ddab7@default> <q2sde76405a1004060423x84ec1662zeedc26f3ab54ad31@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <0a8805a2-ee8b-456d-a4ed-b75c34f73661@default>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 5:51 PM, Dan Magenheimer
<dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Thanks again for the reply.  Hope it's OK if I go back
> on-list...  I'm hoping others may be able to reproduce
> as my ability to experiment is limited now (see below).

Oops -- I meant to reply-to-all in that mail, so going back on the
list is actively preferred. :-)

 -George

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Scheduling anomaly with 4.0.0 (rc6)