|   | 
      | 
  
  
      | 
      | 
  
 
     | 
    | 
  
  
     | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
      | 
  
  
    | 
         
xen-devel
RE: [Xen-devel] Optimize credit scheduler __runq_tickle to	 reduce	IPIs
 
| 
To:  | 
Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
Subject:  | 
RE: [Xen-devel] Optimize credit scheduler __runq_tickle to	 reduce	IPIs | 
 
| 
From:  | 
"Wei, Gang" <gang.wei@xxxxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
Date:  | 
Fri, 19 Mar 2010 17:55:26 +0800 | 
 
| 
Accept-language:  | 
zh-CN, en-US | 
 
| 
Acceptlanguage:  | 
zh-CN, en-US | 
 
| 
Cc:  | 
George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Tian,	Kevin" <kevin.tian@xxxxxxxxx>,	"xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,	Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Yu, Ke" <ke.yu@xxxxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
Delivery-date:  | 
Fri, 19 Mar 2010 02:56:07 -0700 | 
 
| 
Envelope-to:  | 
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | 
 
| 
In-reply-to:  | 
<4BA356BD0200007800035DA7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
List-help:  | 
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> | 
 
| 
List-id:  | 
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> | 
 
| 
List-post:  | 
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> | 
 
| 
List-subscribe:  | 
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> | 
 
| 
List-unsubscribe:  | 
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> | 
 
| 
References:  | 
<E6467867A6B05E4FA831B7DF29925F5C40D6628C@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>	<4BA356BD0200007800035DA7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
Sender:  | 
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | 
 
| 
Thread-index:  | 
AcrHSXxun55kfzdNR7O5vWqFYw1JGwAAKLew | 
 
| 
Thread-topic:  | 
[Xen-devel] Optimize credit scheduler __runq_tickle to	 reduce	IPIs | 
 
 
 
Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> "Wei, Gang" <gang.wei@xxxxxxxxx> 19.03.10 09:22 >>>
>> 2. if first_cpu() was used as the way to choose the target among all
>> possible idle cpus, will it cause overall unbalanced cpu
>> utilization? i.e. cpu 0 > cpu 1 > ... > cpu N  
> 
> This can be easily avoided by using cycle_cpu() and tracking the last
> used CPU on e.g. a per-pCPU basis (similar to idle_bias used in
> _csched_cpu_pick()).  
Good sugguestion, thanks.
Jimmy
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 
 |   
 
 | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
    |