WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Re: xen/stable 2.6.32.9 32bit dom0 kernel crashes early

On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 11:33:18AM -0800, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> On 03/08/2010 10:17 AM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 06, 2010 at 05:05:09PM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
>>    
>>> On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 12:51:02PM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
>>>      
>>>> On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 09:13:59AM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
>>>>        
>>>>> On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 01:33:39PM -0800, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>>>>>          
>>>>>> On 03/04/2010 12:28 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
>>>>>>            
>>>>>>> It was 2.6.31.12-174.2.22.fc12.i686.PAE saying the above..
>>>>>>> 2.6.32.9 xen/stable booted on baremetal doesn't say anything about NX.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>              
>>>>>> What happens if you boot with noexec=no on the kernel command line?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>            
>>>>> noexec=no didn't change anything.. still crashes. console output is the 
>>>>> same as earlier.
>>>>> I also checked the BIOS, it didn't seem to have any NX settings.
>>>>>
>>>>>          
>>>> latest xen/master 2.6.31.6 seems to boot OK on this box, with the same Xen 
>>>> 4.0.0-rc5 hypervisor.
>>>>
>>>> successful bootlog of xen/master 2.6.31.6 here:
>>>> http://pasik.reaktio.net/xen/pv_ops-dom0-debug/pv_ops-dom0-xen-master-2.6.31.6-32b-works-log03.txt
>>>>
>>>>        
>>> xen/stable 2.6.32.9 boots OK on baremetal (without Xen).
>>> Does it help to have a log of the boot on baremetal?
>>>
>>> Here are a couple of xen/stable 2.6.32.9 crashing boots as Xen dom0,
>>> with various debugging options, and also with "acpi=off":
>>>      
>> Could you find what is at c0405dbe and around that area with gdb?
>>    
>
> I think the problem is that there's something happening in  
> kernel/head_32.S to test for NX and disable it if not present, which  
> isn't happening on the Xen startup path.  But I haven't investigated  
> that yet.
>

Should I try using kernel/head_32.S from 2.6.31.6 with 2.6.32.10 dom0 kernel? 
I have access to the machine in question again on sunday, so I could test 
things then.

-- Pasi


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>