WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 		  
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [Xen-devel] A clocksource question

from [Jeremy Fitzhardinge] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Joanna Rutkowska <joanna@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] A clocksource question
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 11:30:08 -0800
Cc: Tobias Geiger <tobias.geiger@xxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 11:30:52 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4B9B61CD.80401@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <4B962748.90609@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4B9A8FDE.8070506@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4B9AB126.1070406@xxxxxxxx> <201003122256.02254.tobias.geiger@xxxxxxxxx> <4B9AB9FE.8070601@xxxxxxxx> <4B9AABB9.7030906@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4B9AAE6A.6050801@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4B9AD2DD.90907@xxxxxxxx> <4B9B61CD.80401@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100301 Fedora/3.0.3-1.fc12 Lightning/1.0b2pre Thunderbird/3.0.3 
On 03/13/2010 01:58 AM, Joanna Rutkowska wrote:

In the meantime found a similar thread on KVM:
http://www.mail-archive.com/kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg22925.html

and also a patch suggested there:

http://www.mail-archive.com/kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg23491.html

Don't have time to try the patch right now, but courious to hear your
opinion in the meantime...
I was just looking at that logic yesterday and was approaching a similar conclusion, so I'm glad Marcelo sorted it out. It looks like a variant of that patch got into 2.6.33 (41d2e4949377) , so I'll look at backporting it. Actually it's probably -stable material. 

    J

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [Xen-devel] domU guest for xcp 0.1.1, Pasi Kärkkäinen
Next by Date:  Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [Patch RFC] ttm: nouveau accelerated on Xen pv-ops kernel, Joanna Rutkowska
Previous by Thread:  Re: [Xen-devel] A clocksource question, Joanna Rutkowska
Next by Thread:  Re: [Xen-devel] A clocksource question, Tobias Geiger
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]
 
   

Copyright , Citrix Systems Inc. All rights reserved. Legal and Privacy