|   | 
      | 
  
  
      | 
      | 
  
 
     | 
    | 
  
  
     | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
      | 
  
  
    | 
         
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] VT-d: improve RMRR validity checking
 
| 
To:  | 
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@xxxxxx> | 
 
| 
Subject:  | 
Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] VT-d: improve RMRR validity checking | 
 
| 
From:  | 
Weidong Han <weidong.han@xxxxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
Date:  | 
Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:30:05 +0800 | 
 
| 
Cc:  | 
"xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,	Noboru Iwamatsu <n_iwamatsu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Cihula,	Joseph" <joseph.cihula@xxxxxxxxx>, "Kay, Allen M" <allen.m.kay@xxxxxxxxx>,	"linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,	"keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
Delivery-date:  | 
Thu, 11 Mar 2010 00:30:52 -0800 | 
 
| 
Envelope-to:  | 
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | 
 
| 
In-reply-to:  | 
<1268283150.3015.69.camel@xxxxxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
List-help:  | 
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> | 
 
| 
List-id:  | 
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> | 
 
| 
List-post:  | 
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> | 
 
| 
List-subscribe:  | 
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> | 
 
| 
List-unsubscribe:  | 
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> | 
 
| 
References:  | 
<C77E162B.6FE6%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>		<4B59098B.6000108@xxxxxxxxx> <4B590FA4.4000008@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>		<4B59132B.40607@xxxxxxxxx> <4B59188C.50901@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>		<4B59660F.4000909@xxxxxxxxx>		<7162ab21003091339i4adb8669safd5e074607386a2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>		<4B9706B3.3050903@xxxxxxxxx> <1268191101.3015.30.camel@xxxxxxxxxx>		<4B9711CF.7030908@xxxxxxxxx> <1268192253.3015.37.camel@xxxxxxxxxx>		<4B971F57.9000903@xxxxxxxxx> <1268196438.3015.56.camel@xxxxxxxxxx>		<4B974438.3050806@xxxxxxxxx>	<1268229408.14039.151.camel@xxxxxxxxxx>		<1268244414.14039.206.camel@xxxxxxxxxx>	<4B985150.1000001@xxxxxxxxx>	 <1268274721.3015.64.camel@xxxxxxxxxx>	<4B986736.9000204@xxxxxxxxx> <1268283150.3015.69.camel@xxxxxxxxxx> | 
 
| 
Sender:  | 
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx | 
 
| 
User-agent:  | 
Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) | 
 
 
 
Alex Williamson wrote:
 On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 11:44 +0800, Weidong Han wrote:   
  
good suggestion to check the device type. I cooked a new patch. It skips 
checking IOAPIC and HPET. pls have a try.
    
 
I like this approach better, but the patch doesn't work as is.  The
problem is acpi_scope is getting incremented as a structure instead of
by length bytes.  It either needs to be cast on the increment, or maybe
cast on use like this:
Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@xxxxxx>
diff -r 132ac04cbdba xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/dmar.c
--- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/dmar.c        Tue Mar 09 18:18:19 2010 +0000
+++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/dmar.c        Wed Mar 10 21:46:49 2010 -0700
@@ -407,9 +407,15 @@
     {
         u8 b, d, f;
         int i, invalid_cnt = 0;
+        void *p;
 
-        for ( i = 0; i < dmaru->scope.devices_cnt; i++ )
+        for ( i = 0, p = dev_scope_start; i < dmaru->scope.devices_cnt;
+              i++, p += ((struct acpi_dev_scope *)p)->length )
         {
+            if ( ((struct acpi_dev_scope *)p)->dev_type == ACPI_DEV_IOAPIC ||
+                 ((struct acpi_dev_scope *)p)->dev_type == ACPI_DEV_MSI_HPET )
+                continue;
+
             b = PCI_BUS(dmaru->scope.devices[i]);
             d = PCI_SLOT(dmaru->scope.devices[i]);
             f = PCI_FUNC(dmaru->scope.devices[i]);
  
 
Acked-by: Weidong Han <weidong.han@xxxxxxxxx>
Regards,
Weidong
 
   
diff -r cadf1bae9ee2 xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/dmar.c
--- a/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/dmar.c    Thu Feb 25 18:26:45 2010 +0800
+++ b/xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/dmar.c    Thu Mar 11 19:39:45 2010 +0800
@@ -407,9 +407,15 @@ acpi_parse_one_drhd(struct acpi_dmar_ent
     {
         u8 b, d, f;
         int i, invalid_cnt = 0;
+        struct acpi_dev_scope *acpi_scope = dev_scope_start;
         for ( i = 0; i < dmaru->scope.devices_cnt; i++ )
         {
+            acpi_scope += (i == 0) ? 0 : acpi_scope->length;
+            if ( acpi_scope->dev_type == ACPI_DEV_IOAPIC ||
+                 acpi_scope->dev_type == ACPI_DEV_MSI_HPET )
+                continue;
+
             b = PCI_BUS(dmaru->scope.devices[i]);
             d = PCI_SLOT(dmaru->scope.devices[i]);
             f = PCI_FUNC(dmaru->scope.devices[i]);
    
 
   
 
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 
 |   
 
| <Prev in Thread] | 
Current Thread | 
[Next in Thread> |  
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] VT-d: improve RMRR validity checking, (continued)
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] VT-d: improve RMRR validity checking, Alex Williamson
 - Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] VT-d: improve RMRR validity checking, Weidong Han
 - Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] VT-d: improve RMRR validity checking, Alex Williamson
 - Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] VT-d: improve RMRR validity checking, Weidong Han
 - Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] VT-d: improve RMRR validity checking, Alex Williamson
 - Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] VT-d: improve RMRR validity checking, Alex Williamson
 - Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] VT-d: improve RMRR validity checking, Weidong Han
 - Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] VT-d: improve RMRR validity checking, Alex Williamson
 - Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] VT-d: improve RMRR validity checking, Weidong Han
 - Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] VT-d: improve RMRR validity checking, Alex Williamson
 - Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] VT-d: improve RMRR validity checking,
Weidong Han <=
 
    
 
 |  
  
 | 
    | 
  
  
    |   | 
    |