[Xen-devel] Re: [RFC][PATCH] Scheduler interface changes for cre

To:	George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:	[Xen-devel] Re: [RFC][PATCH] Scheduler interface changes for credit2
From:	Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Mon, 22 Feb 2010 17:32:50 +0000
Cc:	"xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date:	Mon, 22 Feb 2010 09:33:23 -0800
Envelope-to:	www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to:	<4B82ADE2.3000501@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help:	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id:	Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post:	<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe:	<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender:	xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index:	Acqz2masjs3o/J2OQOW1ZmVWP6bKywACqd8u
Thread-topic:	[RFC][PATCH] Scheduler interface changes for credit2
User-agent:	Microsoft-Entourage/12.23.0.091001

On 22/02/2010 16:16, "George Dunlap" <George.Dunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I suppose we could think about changing things around, so that there's a
> generic "callback on context switch" flag.  Then we'd only have one
> callback in the context switch code, and the check would only happen if
> the flag was set (reducing cache footprint).  It would be a slightly
> larger patch, and make changes to the other schedulers, but those would
> be pretty minimal.
> 
> I'll play around with it and see how it looks.

Nah, I think we'll just go with it as it is. It's clean and the path isn't
*that* hot.

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] Re: [RFC][PATCH] Scheduler interface changes for credit2