Re: [Xen-devel] AMD extended migration CPU masks: why only on CP

Hi, 

At 20:27 +0000 on 19 Feb (1266611232), Wei Huang wrote:
> The (extended) CPUID mask MSRs are associated with each core. They need 
> to be updated on each core if migration happens across CPUs. Changset 
> 18402 does update the MSRs for each core.

Oh, so it does. :)  My mistake; sorry for the noise.

Cheers,

Tim.

-- 
Tim Deegan <Tim.Deegan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Principal Software Engineer, XenServer Engineering
Citrix Systems UK Ltd.  (Company #02937203, SL9 0BG)

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[Xen-devel] AMD extended migration CPU masks: why only on CPU 0?, Tim Deegan Re: [Xen-devel] AMD extended migration CPU masks: why only on CPU 0?, Wei Huang Re: [Xen-devel] AMD extended migration CPU masks: why only on CPU 0?, Tim Deegan <=

Previous by Date:

Re: [Xen-devel] cpuidle causing Dom0 soft lockups, Jan Beulich

Next by Date:

Re: [Xen-devel] cpuidle causing Dom0 soft lockups, Keir Fraser

Previous by Thread:

Re: [Xen-devel] AMD extended migration CPU masks: why only on CPU 0?, Wei Huang

Next by Thread:

[Xen-devel] [PATCH] tmem: fix to 20945 "When tmem is enabled, reserve a fraction of memory", Dan Magenheimer

Indexes:

[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]