WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Remus and Kemari...

To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Remus and Kemari...
From: Gilberto Nunes <gilberto.nunes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 08:12:21 -0200
Delivery-date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 02:12:33 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20100121002016.GB10013@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: Selbetti Gestão de Documentos
References: <4B4F0581.30005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100121002016.GB10013@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: KMail/1.12.2 (Linux/2.6.27.42-0.1-default; KDE/4.3.2; i686; ; )
Em Quarta-feira 20 Janeiro 2010, às 22:20:17, Brendan Cully escreveu:

Hi Brendan...


> On Thursday, 14 January 2010 at 09:52, gilberto nunes wrote:
> > I installed the Remus but had some problems.
> > He leaves the VM very slow. I'm using a partition with DRBD / LVM.
> > May even be that you say that has many layers (DRBD / LVM) that can
> > influence on performance.
> > But the interesting thing is that when Remus is not running the VM is
> > light even with 512M of memory. And look what I'm talking about a Windows
> > 2003 Standard Edition.
> > The Remus to stop working inexplicably (at least for me)
> > and let the VM's started in a state of the two nodes ...
> 

> It's taken me a while to get Xen unstable running again, but now that
> I have I can't reproduce any of these problems with an XP guest. It
> remains responsive while Remus is running, and doesn't fail over
> unless I kill it.

Right

> 
> Disk access isn't likely to make a huge performance difference
> (although I should say, simply parking a Remus VM on top of DRBD is
> not safe, since there is no way of rolling back changes that have been
> written since the most recent checkpoint). 

What you suggest... NFS!

> It sounds like your network
> link between the primary and backup is either low capacity or flaky in
> some way, or you have a loaded dom0.

My network between primary and backup server is a dedicate network, make with 
a dedicate fast ethernet switch...

I do not understand wath you say about that "I have a loaded dom0". On fact, 
Xen always have a loaded dom0, right!

> 
> I'd recommend using single-processor dom0 and guest to start with, and
> pinning the VCPUs to their own separate physical cores. 

I see. But how I do this!! I am a newbie. If you can point some ways to me, 
I'll appreciate...

> I'd also do a
> bit of network measurement along the link you're using to the backup,
> to check capacity, latency, and jitter.
> 


Thanks a lot
-- 

Gilberto Nunes Ferreira
TI
Selbetti Gestão de Documentos
Telefone: +55 (47) 3441-6004
Celular: +55 (47) 8861-6672 








_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>