On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 10:26:10AM -0800, mail ignored wrote:
> wrt acpi vs pit,
>
> reading @ http://the-b.org/Linux_timers, it seems (?) acpi may be, in
> general, the better options, as pit " ... doesn't gain lost time
> because it doesn't have lost tick correction code ..."
>
> iiuc, that references those timers @kernel -- not clear if it is/isn't
> relevant to Xen ...
>
What was the default clocksource for you, showing the bad ntpd
behaviour?
-- Pasi
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|