 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] tmem_relinquish_page: failing order=<n>
| To: | <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Xen-devel] tmem_relinquish_page: failing order=<n> |
| From: | "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 06 Jan 2010 16:00:29 +0000 |
| Cc: | xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| Delivery-date: | Wed, 06 Jan 2010 08:00:30 -0800 |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Dan, having taken a fresh snapshot of xen-unstable today, I start seeing quite a number of these messages during late Xen and early Dom0 boot. They don't seem to be very meaningful (according to the stack traces I created for some of them to understand where they originate), hence I wonder whether they couldn't get silenced. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86: fix NUMA handling (c/s 20599), Jan Beulich |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [Xen-devel] [PATCH] less verbose tmem, was: tmem_relinquish_page: failing order=<n>, Dan Magenheimer |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86: fix NUMA handling (c/s 20599), Jan Beulich |
| Next by Thread: | [Xen-devel] [PATCH] less verbose tmem, was: tmem_relinquish_page: failing order=<n>, Dan Magenheimer |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
