WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Correct handling node with CPU populated but no

To: "Jiang, Yunhong" <yunhong.jiang@xxxxxxxxx>, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Correct handling node with CPU populated but no memory populated
From: "Jiang, Yunhong" <yunhong.jiang@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 16:20:18 +0800
Accept-language: en-US
Acceptlanguage: en-US
Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Mon, 04 Jan 2010 00:21:44 -0800
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <C8EDE645B81E5141A8C6B2F73FD9265107A2AACADE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <C8EDE645B81E5141A8C6B2F73FD9265107A2AACADE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcqFTuO2u2OxkVxJRv26PUuSaroeEgHxpGtw
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Correct handling node with CPU populated but no memory populated
>Firstly,  Per my understanding to the code itself, these two functions achieve 
>the
>same purpose, but I can't understanding why srat_detect_node need be called 
>after
>the CPU is up. As this is backported from kernel, so I checked linux kernel. 
>In linux
>kernel, the srat_detect_node is mainly for one quirk for AMD platform, but 
>that quirk
>is not implemented in Xen side. So is the quirk is really needed?
>
>Also, are there any special reason that init_cpu_to_node() can't be called 
>right after
>numa_initmem_init()? I think it will be cleaner if we setup the whole numa
>information in one place. Originally I suspect it is related to 
>generic_apic_probe(),
>but after checking the code, I didn't find anything related. Did I miss 
>anything?

Seems I do missed something here after checking the code again. The 
init_cpu_to_node() depends on the the cpu_to_apicid information, which will be 
achieved only after the MADT table parser.
As for the srat_detect_node(), although it is in fact same to 
init_cpu_to_node() currently per my understanding, but it is really harmless, 
so I'd leave it, so that one day some quirks can be added after the CPU is 
identified already.
So seems it does not need any clean at all. Really sorry for the wrong alerm.

--jyh

>
>Thanks
>--jyh
>
># HG changeset patch
># User Yunhong Jiang <yunhong.jiang@xxxxxxxxx>
># Date 1261684998 -28800
># Node ID 986dae93aea54f575202dcbaacbf3f4ff05032d4
># Parent  98c4b2498415751f97091631907d9d173ac0092f
>
>Correct handling node with CPU populated but no memory populated
>
>In changset 20599, the node that has no memory populated is marked parsed, but
>not online. However, if there are CPU populated in this node, the 
>corresponding CPU
>mapping (i.e. the cpu_to_node) is still setup to the offline node, this will 
>cause
>trouble for memory allocation.
>
>This patch changes the init_cpu_to_node() and srant_detect_node(), to 
>considering
>the node is offlined situation.
>
>Now the apicid_to_node is only used to keep the mapping between cpu/node
>provided by BIOS, and should not be used for memory allocation anymore.
>
>One thing left is to update the cpu_to_node mapping after memory populated by
>memory hot-add.
>
>Signed-off-by: Jiang, Yunhong <yunhong.jiang@xxxxxxxxx>
>
>diff -r 98c4b2498415 -r 986dae93aea5 xen/arch/x86/numa.c
>--- a/xen/arch/x86/numa.c      Thu Dec 24 15:59:44 2009 +0000
>+++ b/xen/arch/x86/numa.c      Fri Dec 25 04:03:18 2009 +0800
>@@ -35,6 +35,9 @@ unsigned char cpu_to_node[NR_CPUS] __rea
> unsigned char cpu_to_node[NR_CPUS] __read_mostly = {
>       [0 ... NR_CPUS-1] = NUMA_NO_NODE
> };
>+/*
>+ * Keep BIOS's CPU2node information, should not be used for memory allocaion
>+ */
> unsigned char apicid_to_node[MAX_LOCAL_APIC] __cpuinitdata = {
>       [0 ... MAX_LOCAL_APIC-1] = NUMA_NO_NODE
> };
>@@ -288,14 +291,16 @@ static __init int numa_setup(char *opt)
>  */
> void __devinit init_cpu_to_node(void)
> {
>-      int i;
>+      int i, node;
>       for (i = 0; i < NR_CPUS; i++) {
>               u32 apicid = x86_cpu_to_apicid[i];
>               if (apicid == BAD_APICID)
>                       continue;
>-              if (apicid_to_node[apicid] == NUMA_NO_NODE)
>-                      continue;
>-              numa_set_node(i,apicid_to_node[apicid]);
>+        node = apicid_to_node[apicid];
>+
>+              if ( node == NUMA_NO_NODE || !node_online(node) )
>+                      node = 0;
>+              numa_set_node(i, node);
>       }
> }
>
>diff -r 98c4b2498415 -r 986dae93aea5 xen/arch/x86/setup.c
>--- a/xen/arch/x86/setup.c     Thu Dec 24 15:59:44 2009 +0000
>+++ b/xen/arch/x86/setup.c     Fri Dec 25 04:03:18 2009 +0800
>@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
> #include <xen/rcupdate.h>
> #include <xen/vga.h>
> #include <xen/dmi.h>
>+#include <xen/nodemask.h>
> #include <public/version.h>
> #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
> #include <compat/platform.h>
>@@ -252,7 +253,7 @@ void __devinit srat_detect_node(int cpu)
>     u32 apicid = x86_cpu_to_apicid[cpu];
>
>     node = apicid_to_node[apicid];
>-    if ( node == NUMA_NO_NODE )
>+    if ( node == NUMA_NO_NODE || !node_online(node) )
>         node = 0;
>     numa_set_node(cpu, node);
>
>diff -r 98c4b2498415 -r 986dae93aea5 xen/arch/x86/smpboot.c
>--- a/xen/arch/x86/smpboot.c   Thu Dec 24 15:59:44 2009 +0000
>+++ b/xen/arch/x86/smpboot.c   Fri Dec 25 04:03:18 2009 +0800
>@@ -913,7 +913,7 @@ static int __devinit do_boot_cpu(int api
>       }
> #else
>       if (!per_cpu(compat_arg_xlat, cpu))
>-              setup_compat_arg_xlat(cpu, apicid_to_node[apicid]);
>+              setup_compat_arg_xlat(cpu, cpu_to_node[cpu]);
> #endif
>
>       if (!idt_tables[cpu]) {
>diff -r 98c4b2498415 -r 986dae93aea5 xen/arch/x86/x86_64/mm.c
>--- a/xen/arch/x86/x86_64/mm.c Thu Dec 24 15:59:44 2009 +0000
>+++ b/xen/arch/x86/x86_64/mm.c Fri Dec 25 04:03:18 2009 +0800
>@@ -997,7 +997,7 @@ void __init subarch_init_memory(void)
>     }
>
>     if ( setup_compat_arg_xlat(smp_processor_id(),
>-                               apicid_to_node[boot_cpu_physical_apicid]) )
>+                               cpu_to_node[0]) )
>         panic("Could not setup argument translation area");
> }
>
>


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Correct handling node with CPU populated but no memory populated, Jiang, Yunhong <=