| |
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 0 of 1] Deal with Serial Over LAN (SOL) IPMI
Keir Fraser wrote:
> On 14/12/2009 15:10, "Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk" <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> During the testing of Intel blades we found that the Serial Over LAN
>> does not generate IRQs that well. Gary came up with a patch that
>> figures out if it needs to poll or just work as before (IRQ). The benefit
>> of this patch is that you don't need to do:
>>
>> com1=115200,8n1,0
>>
>> but instead can just do com1=115200,8n1 which is great in the field
>> where you don't want the bootup file to change.
>
> Kinda gross, and I'm not sure it's straightforward enough that I trust it on
> all systems that currently work fine (vast majority). I *might* consider it
> if it's a non-default boot option to turn it on. I don't believe that Linux
> does such things either, at least by default.
The Linux 8250.c driver does something vaguely similar when initializing a
UART. It explicitly
transmits a character to force an interrupt to test that the THRE bit is
handled correctly.
I thought it a bit more risky to add an explicit sequence to test for the
interrupt....
just start with polling enabled, and if the interrupt shows up it's ok to stop
polling.
But as you say, it's a small minority of systems that have this problem anyway
(IIRC, we saw this
for an Intel Clearbay platform).
/gary
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
|
|
| |
|
Home