Re: [Xen-devel] Re: APIC rework

[Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>]

> 
> I don't particularly object to xenbus_walk per-se, its just that I don't
> think xen_create_msi_irq() should call it directly.  It would be OK for
> xen_setup_msi_irqs() to call it and pass the results into
> xen_create_msi_irq().
> 
> Would a registration list be any cleaner?  Presumably you'd just keep a
> list of devices being controlled by other domains, so non-presence on
> the list means DOMID_SELF, so you'd only need to worry about
> registration on pciback paths.  If that could be done without needing to
> touch common code (or do the horrible hacks that some of the earlier MSI
> patches did), then maybe its worthwhile.

I think that would work nicely. Should have a patch cooked up shortly
after I am done with the xen-fbfront drier in DomU.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel