|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Re: APIC rework
On 11/16/09 19:45, Keir Fraser wrote:
> It's kind of a shame to need this though. Is there no way for the hypervisor
> to work out automatically whether an older dom0 is running? Or work out the
> trigger/level stuff for itself (after all it parses the relevant bios tables
> just like dom0)?
If Xen can set the interrupt triggering by itself, why would it ever
need dom0 to do it? Couldn't it just preconfigure all the pins, and
then wait for dom0 to provide/request the pirq<->evtchn mapping?
J
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] Re: APIC rework, (continued)
- [Xen-devel] Re: APIC rework, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: APIC rework, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- RE: [Xen-devel] Re: APIC rework, Zhang, Xiantao
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: APIC rework, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: APIC rework, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: APIC rework, Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] Re: APIC rework, Zhang, Xiantao
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: APIC rework, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- RE: [Xen-devel] Re: APIC rework, Zhang, Xiantao
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: APIC rework, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: APIC rework,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: APIC rework, Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] Re: APIC rework, Zhang, Xiantao
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: APIC rework, Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] Re: APIC rework, Zhang, Xiantao
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: APIC rework, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- RE: [Xen-devel] Re: APIC rework, Zhang, Xiantao
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: APIC rework, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
- RE: [Xen-devel] Re: APIC rework, Zhang, Xiantao
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: APIC rework, Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] Re: APIC rework, Jiang, Yunhong
|
|
|
|
|