|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
On 10/19/09 04:05, Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
> Attached the patches, and also created the patch for Xen-3.4-testing tree.
> Maybe Keir needs to check-in this patch before Xen-3.4.2 to keep new dom0 be
> able to run on Xen-3.4-2. Add Keir to the list. :-)
>
Hi,
I was just looking at this again and I realize there's been some
non-trival changes which cause conflicts with this patch. Would you
have a chance to revise the patch for the current xen/master?
Alternatively, would it be possible to base the patch on the
xen/dom0/apic topic branch? It's possible this is awkward because of
conflicts from the PCI front/back branches, in which case it may need
some extra patches for those branches.
For now I've applied your current patch to the branch
xen/dom0/apic-xiantao, rooted on the last xen/master branch where it
applies cleanly.
Thanks,
J
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] APIC rework,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <=
- [Xen-devel] Re: APIC rework, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: APIC rework, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- RE: [Xen-devel] Re: APIC rework, Zhang, Xiantao
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: APIC rework, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: APIC rework, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: APIC rework, Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] Re: APIC rework, Zhang, Xiantao
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: APIC rework, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- RE: [Xen-devel] Re: APIC rework, Zhang, Xiantao
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: APIC rework, Keir Fraser
|
|
|
|
|