|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 3.4.1 NUMA support
On 10/11/2009 08:51, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> What default confinement? I thought guests had an all-pCPUs affinity mask be
>> default?
>
> Not with numa=on (see also Andre's post to this effect): The guest will
> get assigned to a node, and its affinity set to that node's CPUs.
...And if it didn't, striping would not happen. In fact iirc the default
NUMA allocation policy for an all-pcpus domain is in some respects pessimal:
vcpu0's initial node gets drained of memory first. I.e., you get *less*
'striping' than you could with numa=off where you might at least get lucky.
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 3.4.1 NUMA support, (continued)
- Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 3.4.1 NUMA support, George Dunlap
- RE: [Xen-devel] Xen 3.4.1 NUMA support, Ian Pratt
- Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 3.4.1 NUMA support, Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] Xen 3.4.1 NUMA support, Ian Pratt
- Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 3.4.1 NUMA support, Jan Beulich
- RE: [Xen-devel] Xen 3.4.1 NUMA support, Ian Pratt
- RE: [Xen-devel] Xen 3.4.1 NUMA support, Jan Beulich
- Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 3.4.1 NUMA support,
Keir Fraser <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 3.4.1 NUMA support, Keir Fraser
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH] tools: avoid over-commitment if numa=on, Andre Przywara
|
|
|
|
|