xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] IRQ SMP affinity problems in domU with vcpus > 4 on HP P
To: |
"Zhang, Xiantao" <xiantao.zhang@xxxxxxxxx>, "Cinco, Dante" <Dante.Cinco@xxxxxxx>, "He, Qing" <qing.he@xxxxxxxxx> |
Subject: |
Re: [Xen-devel] IRQ SMP affinity problems in domU with vcpus > 4 on HP ProLiant G6 with dual Xeon 5540 (Nehalem) |
From: |
Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: |
Thu, 22 Oct 2009 07:25:05 +0100 |
Cc: |
"xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Delivery-date: |
Wed, 21 Oct 2009 23:25:44 -0700 |
Envelope-to: |
www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
In-reply-to: |
<706158FABBBA044BAD4FE898A02E4BC201C9BD91C0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
List-help: |
<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
List-id: |
Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
List-post: |
<mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
List-subscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
List-unsubscribe: |
<http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
Sender: |
xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Thread-index: |
AcpOPi4Q9UlUI8ufS5qQ1CJSqDysQAAAM40gAAsf3SAABZW6UAAQxcbQAJQYlsAADK/qgAAEGtWgABRnJ9AAEEcpwAAiDlkgABCR9DAAApQ+oAAIGJIC |
Thread-topic: |
[Xen-devel] IRQ SMP affinity problems in domU with vcpus > 4 on HP ProLiant G6 with dual Xeon 5540 (Nehalem) |
User-agent: |
Microsoft-Entourage/12.20.0.090605 |
On 22/10/2009 03:42, "Zhang, Xiantao" <xiantao.zhang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> This should be written by dom0(likely to be Qemu). And if it does
>> exist, we may have to prohibit such unsafe writings about MSI in
>> Qemu.
>
> Another issue may exist which leads to the issue. Currenlty, both Qemu and
> hypervisor can program MSI but Xen lacks synchronization mechnism between them
> to avoid race. As said in the last mail, Qemu shouldn't be allowed to do the
> unsafe writing about MSI Info, and insteadly, it should resort to hypervisor
> through hypercall for MSI programing, otherwise, Qemu may write staled MSI
> info to PCI devices and leads to the strange issues.
> Keir/Ian
> What's your opinion about the potential issue ? Maybe we need to add a lock
> between them or just allow hypervisor to do the writing ?
In general, having qemu make pci updates via the cf8/cfc method is clearly
unsafe, and cannot be made safe. I would certainly be happy to see some of
the low-level PCI management pushed into pciback (and/or pci-stub, depending
on whether pciback is to be ported to pv_ops).
-- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- RE: [Xen-devel] IRQ SMP affinity problems in domU with vcpus > 4 on HP ProLiant G6 with dual Xeon 5540 (Nehalem), (continued)
- RE: [Xen-devel] IRQ SMP affinity problems in domU with vcpus > 4 on HP ProLiant G6 with dual Xeon 5540 (Nehalem), Cinco, Dante
- RE: [Xen-devel] IRQ SMP affinity problems in domU with vcpus > 4 on HP ProLiant G6 with dual Xeon 5540 (Nehalem), Zhang, Xiantao
- RE: [Xen-devel] IRQ SMP affinity problems in domU with vcpus > 4 on HP ProLiant G6 with dual Xeon 5540 (Nehalem), Cinco, Dante
- RE: [Xen-devel] IRQ SMP affinity problems in domU with vcpus > 4 on HP ProLiant G6 with dual Xeon 5540 (Nehalem), Zhang, Xiantao
- RE: [Xen-devel] IRQ SMP affinity problems in domU with vcpus > 4 on HP ProLiant G6 with dual Xeon 5540 (Nehalem), Zhang, Xiantao
- RE: [Xen-devel] IRQ SMP affinity problems in domU with vcpus > 4 on HP ProLiant G6 with dual Xeon 5540 (Nehalem), Cinco, Dante
- RE: [Xen-devel] IRQ SMP affinity problems in domU with vcpus > 4 on HP ProLiant G6 with dual Xeon 5540 (Nehalem), Zhang, Xiantao
- RE: [Xen-devel] IRQ SMP affinity problems in domU with vcpus > 4 on HP ProLiant G6 with dual Xeon 5540 (Nehalem), Cinco, Dante
- RE: [Xen-devel] IRQ SMP affinity problems in domU with vcpus > 4 on HP ProLiant G6 with dual Xeon 5540 (Nehalem), Zhang, Xiantao
- RE: [Xen-devel] IRQ SMP affinity problems in domU with vcpus > 4 on HP ProLiant G6 with dual Xeon 5540 (Nehalem), Zhang, Xiantao
- Re: [Xen-devel] IRQ SMP affinity problems in domU with vcpus > 4 on HP ProLiant G6 with dual Xeon 5540 (Nehalem),
Keir Fraser <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] IRQ SMP affinity problems in domU with vcpus > 4 on HP ProLiant G6 with dual Xeon 5540 (Nehalem), Jeremy Fitzhardinge
- Re: [Xen-devel] IRQ SMP affinity problems in domU with vcpus > 4 on HP ProLiant G6 with dual Xeon 5540 (Nehalem), Qing He
- RE: [Xen-devel] IRQ SMP affinity problems in domU with vcpus > 4 on HP ProLiant G6 with dual Xeon 5540 (Nehalem), Cinco, Dante
- RE: [Xen-devel] IRQ SMP affinity problems in domU with vcpus > 4 on HP ProLiant G6 with dual Xeon 5540 (Nehalem), Jan Beulich
- RE: [Xen-devel] IRQ SMP affinity problems in domU with vcpus > 4 on HP ProLiant G6 with dual Xeon 5540 (Nehalem), Zhang, Xiantao
- RE: [Xen-devel] IRQ SMP affinity problems in domU with vcpus > 4 on HP ProLiant G6 with dual Xeon 5540 (Nehalem), Jan Beulich
- RE: [Xen-devel] IRQ SMP affinity problems in domU with vcpus > 4 on HP ProLiant G6 with dual Xeon 5540 (Nehalem), Zhang, Xiantao
- Re: [Xen-devel] IRQ SMP affinity problems in domU with vcpus > 4 on HP ProLiant G6 with dual Xeon 5540 (Nehalem), Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] IRQ SMP affinity problems in domU with vcpus > 4 on HP ProLiant G6 with dual Xeon 5540 (Nehalem), Zhang, Xiantao
- RE: [Xen-devel] IRQ SMP affinity problems in domU with vcpus > 4 on HP ProLiant G6 with dual Xeon 5540 (Nehalem), Cinco, Dante
|
|
|