 Home |
Products |
Support |
Community |
News |
xen-devel
[Xen-devel] XEN_DOMINF_cpu{mask,shift} ???
| To: | <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Xen-devel] XEN_DOMINF_cpu{mask,shift} ??? |
| From: | "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 21 Oct 2009 12:18:18 +0100 |
| Delivery-date: | Wed, 21 Oct 2009 04:17:55 -0700 |
| Envelope-to: | www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| List-help: | <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help> |
| List-id: | Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com> |
| List-post: | <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com> |
| List-subscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe> |
| List-unsubscribe: | <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe> |
| Sender: | xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
Are these planned to be used for something? Or are they dead remains of some earlier code? At least they don't seem to be used in current code in any way, and if they were they would represent an artificial limitation to 256 physcial CPUs... Thanks, Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Xen-devel] Re: merge conflict in pv_ops dom0 git tree in include/linux/sched.h and arch/x86/kernel/pvclock.c, Pasi Kärkkäinen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [xen-discuss] possible memory-leak in qemu-dm, Pasi Kärkkäinen |
| Previous by Thread: | [Xen-devel] newbie to xen, Junaid Arshad |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Xen-devel] XEN_DOMINF_cpu{mask,shift} ???, Keir Fraser |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
