xen-devel
RE: [Xen-devel] Poor HVM performance with 8 vcpus
> Are there any other of these heuristics tucked away in xen? Would there
> be any benefit to specifying the OS being virtualised in the config? Eg
> "os=windows"?
That's really the only one that springs to mind.
Given how simple a predictor would be, I think that's the best approach.
Setting the OS in the config file is a little tricky as in a couple of
instances you'd want to know the exact version (linux moved the 64b direct
mapped region at some point during 2.6 development).
Ian
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- [Xen-devel] Poor HVM performance with 8 vcpus, Juergen Gross
- Re: [Xen-devel] Poor HVM performance with 8 vcpus, Keir Fraser
- RE: [Xen-devel] Poor HVM performance with 8 vcpus, Ian Pratt
- RE: [Xen-devel] Poor HVM performance with 8 vcpus, James Harper
- RE: [Xen-devel] Poor HVM performance with 8 vcpus,
Ian Pratt <=
- Re: [Xen-devel] Poor HVM performance with 8 vcpus, Juergen Gross
- Re: [Xen-devel] Poor HVM performance with 8 vcpus, Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Poor HVM performance with 8 vcpus, Tim Deegan
- Re: [Xen-devel] Poor HVM performance with 8 vcpus, Juergen Gross
- Re: [Xen-devel] Poor HVM performance with 8 vcpus, George Dunlap
- Re: [Xen-devel] Poor HVM performance with 8 vcpus, Juergen Gross
- Re: [Xen-devel] Poor HVM performance with 8 vcpus, George Dunlap
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: [Xen-devel] Poor HVM performance with 8 vcpus, George Dunlap
- Re: [Xen-devel] Poor HVM performance with 8 vcpus, Juergen Gross
- Re: [Xen-devel] Poor HVM performance with 8 vcpus, Tim Deegan
|
|
|