WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 8] Xen-side netchannel2 patches, take two

To: Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx>, Steven Smith <Steven.Smith@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 8] Xen-side netchannel2 patches, take two
From: Ian Pratt <Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 21:41:47 +0100
Accept-language: en-US
Acceptlanguage: en-US
Cc: Ian, "joserenato.santos@xxxxxx" <joserenato.santos@xxxxxx>, "JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>, Pratt <Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Tue, 06 Oct 2009 13:43:56 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20091006202840.GQ1434@xxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <patchbomb.1254843342@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20091006202840.GQ1434@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: AcpGw7g+rQHqC8zxQ9WFcHuq3+l2rgAATxxQ
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 8] Xen-side netchannel2 patches, take two
> On Tue, Oct 06, 2009 at 04:35:42PM +0100, steven.smith@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > This patch series includes all of the Xen and tools bits of
> > netchannel2.  It's essentially similar to the one I posted on Sunday,
> > except:
> >
> > -- I've dropped the unmodified drivers support.  It'd probably be
> >    fairly straightforward to re-introduce it, but it's not clear that
> >    anyone's actually using unmodified drivers any more (they don't
> >    even build against a 2.6.27 kernel, for instance).
> 
> At least Redhat/Fedora guys have been thinking of shipping pv-on-hvm Xen
> drivers for Fedora 12 / RHEL6.. But I don't know what's the status of
> that.

Yes, this certainly isn't a feature we want to drop. In fact, it would be good 
to see the pv-on-hvm drivers modified to use some of the pvops functions where 
available. 

Ian

 
> There's also a note about it on Xen Wiki:
> http://wiki.xensource.com/xenwiki/XenParavirtOps
> 
> "Work in progress: pv-on-hvm driver support "
> 
> dunno about the status of that either :)
> 
> -- Pasi
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel