WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] Re: ATI radeon fails with "iommu=soft swiotlb=force" (se

To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: ATI radeon fails with "iommu=soft swiotlb=force" (seen on RV730/RV740 and RS780/RS800)
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2009 10:44:19 -0400
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>, dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Fri, 02 Oct 2009 08:07:28 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4AC613BE0200007800017B2C@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <20090930152149.GA29603@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20091001173558.GA1921@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4AC4FDEA.3070909@xxxxxxxx> <20091001192140.GB2367@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4AC613BE0200007800017B2C@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05)
On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 01:52:46PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> 01.10.09 21:21 >>>
> >The are other users of 'vmalloc_32' that look like they depend on this
> >memory being under the 4GB mark. Most of them are do video capture through
> >USB - so it probably is limited to only accessing up to 4GB.
> 
> I just went through all of the users of vmalloc_32(), and more than half of
> them seem bogus (like some legitimate use of it got cloned many times
> without really needing all the restrictions that come with this). Of course
> I can't verify that I'm right with all of those, so I'm not sure how to
> proceed with trying to do some clean up here...

I actually have some of those devices in the basement or I buy some of
them at the MIT Flea. Will dig them up and make sure they work properly.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>