|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel][PV-ops][PATCH 2/2] VNIF(netfront): Using smart polling i
On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 01:09 +0100, Xu, Dongxiao wrote:
> - Netfront uses a timer to poll the ring instead of event channel
> notification. If guest is transferring data, the timer will start
> working and periodicaly send/receive data from ring. If guest is
> idle and no data is transferring, the timer will stop working
> automatically. It will restart again once there is new data
> transferring.
Doesn't the RING_PUSH_REQUESTS_AND_CHECK_NOTIFY macro already give
effectively this behaviour?
Assuming your patch adds further benefit over CHECK_NOTIFY isn't this
similar to what NAPI does, is there any reason not to use the NAPI
infrastructure in the kernel to implement it?
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread> |
- Re: [Xen-devel][PV-ops][PATCH 2/2] VNIF(netfront): Using smart polling instead of event notification.,
Ian Campbell <=
|
|
|
|
|