This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] x86/numa: fix c/s 20120 (Fix SRAT check for disc

To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] x86/numa: fix c/s 20120 (Fix SRAT check for discontig memory)
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@xxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 06:15:06 -0600
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 05:15:32 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4A97CD2D0200007800012161@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: HP OSLO R&D
References: <4A97CD2D0200007800012161@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Fri, 2009-08-28 at 11:27 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> That change converted the (wrong) assumption of contiguous nodes'
> memory to a similarly wrong one of assuming discontiguous memory (i.e.
> each node having separate E820 table entries). The code ought to be
> able to deal with both, though, and I hope this change makes it so.

Ah, of course.  Thanks Jan, I'll test it out on my end.


Xen-devel mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>