This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH]: Implement bzip2 and LZMA loaders / fixed patch

To: Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx>, Chris Lalancette <clalance@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH]: Implement bzip2 and LZMA loaders / fixed patch for Xen 3.4.1
From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 22:27:29 +0100
Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:27:56 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <C6B37B80.129A5%keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thread-index: Acoh0sfVmvnqN9Q6RZauvFINPQXrbwACI98GAABrcBU=
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] [PATCH]: Implement bzip2 and LZMA loaders / fixed patch for Xen 3.4.1
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/
On 20/08/2009 22:15, "Keir Fraser" <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> Hmm, actually this patch seems to break stubdom build/linking:
> I checked in a variant as c/s 20103, which at least for non-stubdom build of
> libxenguest should do the right thing if liblzma-devel or libbz2-devel
> packages (or whatever they are called) are not installed. See how that goes
> with stubdom. We may just have to massage the Makefile a little more to kill
> off the bz2/lzma stuff for stubdom. I'm not sure why libxenguest is getting
> built for stubdom in the first place though. It's not likely to be very
> useful!

Okay, I tested and fixed the stubdom case, so hopefully c/s 20104 will
actually work for you.

 -- Keir

Xen-devel mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>