WARNING - OLD ARCHIVES

This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
   
 
 
Xen 
 
Home Products Support Community News
 
   
 

xen-devel

[Xen-devel] Performance issues on dom0

To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [Xen-devel] Performance issues on dom0
From: Frédéric VANNIÈRE <frederic@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 17:10:41 +0200
Delivery-date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 08:11:18 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hello,

I'm benching a brand new Nehalem server and I've noticed performance problems when running xen0 without any VMs.

Xen : 3.4.1
OS: Debian 5.0 amd64
HW: Supermicro Dual-Xeon Nehalem L5520 2,27 GHz, 24GB memory, 16 CPUS (8 cores * 2 HT)
native kernel : 2.6.30.4
dom0 kernel 1 : 2.6.18-xen0
dom0 kernel 2 : 2.6.30.2-xen0 (SuSe patchs + config from http://x17.eu/xen )

Benchs: tar xjf linux2.6.30.4.tar.bz2
        build 2.6.30.4 with the default config and "make -j16"
        filebench (mail)
        unixbench -c 16 system

The performances of 2.6.18-xen0 and 2.6.30.2-xen0 are very close (2.6.30 is a little faster) and the filesystem benchmark gives the same values for all kernels.


The dom0 has all the memory, all the vCPUS, no VMs is running, and each vCPU is pinned on a rCPU.

Linux elrond 2.6.30.2-xen0 #4 SMP Fri Aug 14 14:31:11 CEST 2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux

Name ID Mem VCPUs State Time(s) Domain-0 0 24147 16 r----- 23128.5

1. tar xjf
  - native : 13 seconds
  - dom0 : 21 seconds
2. make -j16 linux :
  - native : 56 seconds
  - dom0 : 67 seconds
3. filebench :
  - native : 4268 iops
  - dom0 : 4219 iops
4. unixbench :
  - native : 5262
  - dom0 : 2200 !!!! --> very bad  (1810 with 2.6.18-xen0)




Any idea on the cause ?


Regards,




===========  Unixbench : native ==============
Benchmark Run: mar aoû 18 2009 13:24:36 - 13:51:10
16 CPUs in system; running 16 parallel copies of tests

Execl Throughput 40751.3 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 395854.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 103076.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1363078.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 15770868.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 3671269.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 110360.2 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 65731.1 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (16 concurrent) 4916.5 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 9776.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 6840143.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Partial Index BASELINE RESULT INDEX Execl Throughput 43.0 40751.3 9477.1 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 395854.5 999.6 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 103076.1 622.8 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1363078.3 2350.1 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 15770868.9 12677.5 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 3671269.3 9178.2 Process Creation 126.0 110360.2 8758.7 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 65731.1 15502.6 Shell Scripts (16 concurrent) --- 4916.5 --- Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 9776.3 16293.8 System Call Overhead 15000.0 6840143.9 4560.1 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score (Partial Only) 5262.1


===========  Unixbench : dom0 2.6.30.2 ==============
Benchmark Run: mar aoû 18 2009 15:07:45 - 15:34:31
16 CPUs in system; running 16 parallel copies of tests

Execl Throughput 11593.1 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples) File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 299238.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 79926.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 974072.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Pipe Throughput 3922840.5 lps (10.1 s, 7 samples) Pipe-based Context Switching 1125963.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples) Process Creation 27045.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 23418.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (16 concurrent) 1939.5 lpm (60.2 s, 2 samples) Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 3826.3 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples) System Call Overhead 3592086.9 lps (10.1 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Partial Index BASELINE RESULT INDEX Execl Throughput 43.0 11593.1 2696.1 File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 299238.3 755.7 File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 79926.1 482.9 File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 974072.8 1679.4 Pipe Throughput 12440.0 3922840.5 3153.4 Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 1125963.3 2814.9 Process Creation 126.0 27045.1 2146.4 Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 23418.9 5523.3 Shell Scripts (16 concurrent) --- 1939.5 --- Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 3826.3 6377.2 System Call Overhead 15000.0 3592086.9 2394.7 ======== System Benchmarks Index Score (Partial Only) 2200.0








_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>