This is an archived copy of the Xen.org mailing list, which we have preserved to ensure that existing links to archives are not broken. The live archive, which contains the latest emails, can be found at http://lists.xen.org/
Home Products Support Community News


RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] fix qemu memory leak

To: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] fix qemu memory leak
From: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 12:51:38 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 12:52:27 -0700
Envelope-to: www-data@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0908121818180.10516@kaball-desktop>
List-help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=help>
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
List-post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xensource.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.xensource.com/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>, <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xensource.com?subject=unsubscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Ah, no wonder the two files named block.c in my xen-unstable
tree didn't match the patch!

This seems like a very serious bug then.  Any idea if its
been around a long time or is a recent regression?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stefano Stabellini [mailto:stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2009 11:19 AM
> To: Dan Magenheimer
> Cc: Stefano Stabellini; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] fix qemu memory leak
> On Wed, 12 Aug 2009, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
> > Is this just for stubdom, or is it a generic qemu problem?
> > (Your patch just gives the filename, no path to it.)
> It is a qemu bug, the path is the root directory of the 
> qemu-xen repository.

Xen-devel mailing list