|  |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
 
  |   |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
  
    |  |  | 
  
    |   xen-devel
Re: [Xen-devel] resume of HVM guest without PV drivers 
| On 07/08/2009 12:23, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Won't you always have a race between checking for migration and then
>> entering the cpu-specific hypercall stub?
> 
> Indeed. However, the fixup handler in this case can be trivial - it just
> needs to restart the whole operation (including the have-I-been-resumed
> check).
Mmm fair enough, if you're prepared to make your own VMCALL/VMMCALL stubs
(which seems safe enough) that you know how to unroll from then that could
work.
 -- Keir
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
 | 
 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |  | 
RE: [Xen-devel] resume of HVM guest without PV drivers, James Harper[Xen-devel] resume of HVM guest without PV drivers, Jan Beulich
Re: [Xen-devel] resume of HVM guest without PV drivers, Keir Fraser
Re: [Xen-devel] resume of HVM guest without PV drivers, Jan Beulich
Re: [Xen-devel] resume of HVM guest without PV drivers, Keir Fraser
Re: [Xen-devel] resume of HVM guest without PV drivers, Jan Beulich
Re: [Xen-devel] resume of HVM guest without PV drivers, Keir Fraser
Re: [Xen-devel] resume of HVM guest without PV drivers, Jan Beulich
Re: [Xen-devel] resume of HVM guest without PV drivers, Keir Fraser
RE: [Xen-devel] resume of HVM guest without PV drivers, James Harper
Re: [Xen-devel] resume of HVM guest without PV drivers, Jan Beulich
Re: [Xen-devel] resume of HVM guest without PV drivers,
Keir Fraser <=
RE: [Xen-devel] resume of HVM guest without PV drivers, James Harper
Re: [Xen-devel] resume of HVM guest without PV drivers, Keir Fraser
RE: [Xen-devel] resume of HVM guest without PV drivers, Jan Beulich
RE: [Xen-devel] resume of HVM guest without PV drivers, James Harper
 |  |  | 
  
    |  |  |